Impact factor 2013 plos one instructions

PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. This variant is reported as heterozygous in ~12% of individuals affected with chronic pancreatitis and in ~1.9% of unaffected controls (PMID: 17466744). Based on this data, this variant is expected to confer ~6-12 fold increased risk for chronic pancreatitis in heterozygous carriers. First Published October 23, 2013 Research Article doi.org/10.1177/2158244013507271 Article information Abstract The development of "open" academic content has been strongly embraced and promoted by many advocates, analysts, stakeholders, and reformers in the sector of higher education and academic publishing. Limit manuscript sections and sub-sections to 3 heading levels. Make sure heading levels are clearly indicated in the manuscript text. Layout and spacing Manuscript text should be double-spaced. Do not format text in multiple columns. Page and line numbers Include page numbers and line numbers in the manuscript file. A Thematic Text Analysis of Author Instructions in Psychiatry Journals. June 2014; PLoS ONE 9(6): (ranked by impact factor) performed similarly in this regard. October 2013 · PLoS ONE The first such model evolved after the start of the OA movement, with PLOS ONE, in 2006, where it dominated the volume of OAMJs until at least 2013. 4 In the OAMJ model, a broad journal title is assigned, topic-specific editors are recruited in typically large editor boards, many offering their services for free, METHODS. The authors emailed the editors of the top 200 science journals ranked by Journal Citation Reports impact factor for the year 2012 [].Impact factor is a measure of the average number of times that an article published in a journal is cited during a 2-year period [].In the email, we asked the editors to provide us with information about their retraction policies (if any). Overall, 54% of papers reported the primary outcome and relative sample size calculation, while only 37% also included reproducibility estimates relative to the primary outcome. Papers published in journals with higher impact factors had better compliance with primary outcome reporting and lower overall risk of bias scores. Conclusion PLoS Genetics had the lowest proportion of papers with fewer citations than its impact factor of 6.7, at 65.3%. Highly cited papers explain this disconnect. Nature 's most cited paper in the For those who have spent the time doing the calculation, PLOS ONE 's 2013 Impact Factor (scheduled to be reported mid-June in Thomson Reuters' Journal Citation Report) is expected to drop again, some predicting as low as 3.1. A further drop in PLOS ONE 's citation performance may simply accelerate its fall. Still the speed of growth of open access journals has exceeded conventional subscription-based journals. A study in 2013 demonstrated that 7.9% of all peer reviewed scientific articles were published in open access journals ( 2 ). In the area of medicine, the impact and quality of open access journals have become comparable to traditional journals. Still the speed of growth of open access journals has exceeded conventional subscription-based journals. A study in 2013 demonstrated that 7.9% of all peer reviewed scientific articles