Formocresol pulpotomy pdf printer

A present scenario Agrawal, S. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates for electrosurgical vs formocresol pulpotomy in human primary molar teeth. Indications for use of electrosurgery in Pedodontics. Electrosurgical pulpotomy: a retrospective human study. A comparison with formocresol pulpotomy. Pulpotomy is the accepted therapy for the management of cariously exposed pulps in symptom-free primary molars; however, evidence is lacking about the most appropriate technique. The aim of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness of the Er:YAG laser, calcium hydroxide, and ferric sulfate techniques with that of dilute formocresol in retaining such molars symptom-free. cresol pulpotomy in the treatment of primary teeth is widely accepted as the treatment of choice5.Clinical studies investigating the long-term success rates of formocresol pulpotomy have justified its use and it has been the most popular pulp-dressing material for pulpotomized primary molars for the past 60 years 6,7,8. Request PDF on ResearchGate | Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy of human primary teeth | Formocresol has been a popular pulpotomy medicament in the primary teeth for the past 60 years. However, its toxic Formocresol in pulpotomy was compared with vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste) in pulpectomy in the Howley et al. trial 9. Ferric sulfate and mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomy was compared with zinc oxide and eugenol in pulpectomy in the Nguyen et al. trial 15 . Clinical Evaluation of Low Level Diode Laser Application For Primary Teeth Pulpotomy. (PDF Available) There was no significant difference between diode laser pulpotomy and formocresol tion is pulpotomy [1]. Formocresol (FC) has long been considered as a widely approved pulpotomy medicament for treating teeth for decades. FC pulpotomy is universally the most preferred pulp therapy for primary teeth among dentists [2,3]. However, the use of FC as a pulpotomy agent has recently been chal- A formocresol pulpotomy is currently the recom-mended treatment for carious pulp exposures in vital primary teeth. 1-a In spite of its popularity, the use of formocresol.as a pulpotomy agent remains controversial. Recent clinical studies raise questions as to its effective-ness 4-s as a pulpotomy agent. Using MTA Instead of Formocresol for the Pulpotomy • In this new technique, the MTA paste is allowed to cover the dry pulp stumps (instead of formocresol). • MTA is a powder composed of tricalcium silicate, bismuth oxide, dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, tetracalcium aluminoferrite, and calcium sulfate dihydrate. Pulpotomy therapy is the treatment of choice for cariously exposed vital primary molars. Controversies surrounding formocresol which enjoys good clinical success as a pulpotomy medicament has triggered the search for better alternatives. If I'm just opening up a "hot tooth" to get the patient out of pain prior to having them return for the complete endo/ or referring them out to the endodontist for completion of the case, then I used to very regularly after debriding the canal space of any and all tissue that I could find place a foromocreosol pellet in the pulp chamber prior to closing the tooth up. Clinical success rate for MTA pulpotomy was 100% and 81% for formocresol. Radiographic success rate was 96% for MTA and 81% for formocresol. MTA vsFormocresol-3 • The use of calcium hydroxide for vital pulpotomyin the pri